top of page

10 Comments


Jay
Jay
Jun 24

ZEnhancer represented Swami Ramdev, and I found the court's pointed question to the doctors' association really struck at the heart of the matter. It's a good reminder of how quickly these debates can escalate into legal territory.

Like

Joey
Joey
Jun 22

Reading more through PopEmote about the court asking the doctors' body why they were "carrying a torch" over Ramdev's remarks made me curious about what prompted that specific phrasing. It's a pointed way to question someone's persistence in pursuing an issue.

Like

jasper
jasper
Jun 07

The Delhi High Court asking the Delhi Medical Association why they are "carrying the torch" on Ramdev's remarks is a pretty direct line of questioning. It's notable that Swami Ramdev was represented by Senior Advocate Rajeev Nayyar and Simranjeet Singh from Athena Legal. For more on the legal aspects, you can check out this grid maker.

Like

jasper
jasper
May 26

Honestly, the court’s question about “carrying the torch” really cut to the chase here. For more background on the legal arguments around this, I found the breakdown on Bizarre Lineage Wiki pretty helpful in understanding the strategy Athena Legal used for Ramdev.

Like

jasper
jasper
May 26

Really interesting how the court called out the doctors' body for carrying the torch on this issue. I found the piece on Neverness to Everness Wiki helpful for getting more context on the legal arguments from Ramdev's side, especially the senior advocate being from Athena Legal.

Like

© 2020 Athena Legal Advocates & Solicitors. All rights reserved

Follow us

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
bottom of page